The CHIS Bill: Enshrining Abuse in Law
Without warning, a new law is being rushed through parliament to allow police and other state agencies to self-authorise their agents to commit literally any crime. It would also prohibit civil claims by their victims.
The Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill would enshrine in law not only the right for spycops to commit the abuses that have caused so much public outrage, but much more besides.
Crimes would be permissable if they protect whatever is meant by ‘the economic wellbeing’ of the country. Authorisations would be given without limit or judicial oversight. The powers would extend well beyond the police and security services to include the likes of the Food Standards Agency, Competition & Markets Authority, and the Gambling Commission.
The pace of this law is breathtaking. It was published on 24th September, it had its second reading in the Commons on 5th October and will probably be in the House of Lords before the end of the month.
At the second reading, Labour and the SNP abstained, though about 20 Labour MPs rebelled to oppose it.
The third reading will be on Thursday 15th October, with amendments that would establish some safeguards to prohibit:
- Some serious serious crimes such as murder, torture and rape;
- Trade union infiltration and blacklisting;
- Agents having sexual relationships whilst in their undercover persona
Labour leader Keir Starmer is reported to be planning to instruct Labour MPs to abstain on the third reading, even if the changes being put forward by the opposition are not adopted.
What You Can Do
Before the third reading on Thursday, please email your MP and ask them to support the amendments and oppose the Bill.
Unite the Union has made an online tool that makes it quick and easy to send the email.
Joint Statement
The general secretaries of 14 trade unions, 20 Labour MPs and a number of campaigning organisations including the Campaign Opposing Police Surveillance, have signed a joint statement:
We the undersigned have grave concerns about the measures set out in the Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill as introduced to the Commons at second reading (5 October 2020).
As many will be aware from the circumstances leading up to the setting up of the Mitting (formerly Pitchford) Inquiry into undercover policing, there has been a documented history of state surveillance of lawful trade union activity and justice campaigns in recent years, including apparent links with the criminal blacklisting of trade union members. We are also alarmed by the conduct of undercover police in pursuing surveillance of legitimate civil society organisations including anti-racist organisations, family justice campaigns and environmental groups.
Whilst the government has assured us that the bill will not apply retrospectively, we remain concerned that passing legislation with undue haste and insufficient scrutiny in Committee – pre-empting the findings of the Mitting Inquiry – risks compromising and undermining legal proceedings through which victims of previous criminal conduct by CHIS operatives are seeking justice.
Aside from the timing of the new licensing of criminal conduct by CHIS operatives, our specific concerns about the bill as it stands include:
- The vague definition of “economic wellbeing” being susceptible to interpretations which would implicate aspects of legitimate trade union activity;
- The failure to expressly rule out the authorisation of murder, torture or sexual violence by a CHIS;
- The lack of any provision to compensate innocent victims of criminal conduct undertaken by a CHIS;
- The unnecessarily broad range of agencies able to authorise unlawful conduct;
- The reliance on the Human Rights Act as limiting the scope of what might be legally authorised, despite the government’s own previous reliance on a legal defence that the State cannot be held responsible under the terms of the European Convention on Human Rights for actions undertaken by individual agents, and;
- The lack of prior judicial authorisation or even concurrent judicial oversight.
In light of these concerns, we would ask the government to withdraw the bill to allow for due consideration of the evidence and findings of the Mitting Review, or at the very least to make substantial amendments to the Bill to meet the concerns outlined above.
If sufficient amendments to ensure proper safeguarding in the legislation are not secured, the bill will remain unfit for purpose and cannot be allowed to proceed.
We urge all those who share our concerns to use the tool at this link to email their MP today, to ask them to support the amendments submitted by the Labour frontbench, and to oppose the bill at third reading if the amendments are unsuccessful and the government refuses to withdraw the bill.
Signatories:
Len McCluskey, general secretary, Unite the Union
Matt Wrack, general secretary, Fire Brigades Union (FBU)
Sarah Woolley, general Secretary, Bakers, Food and Allied Workers’ Union (BFAWU)
Dave Ward, general secretary, Communication Workers Union (CWU)
Manuel Cortes, general secretary, Transport Salaried Staffs’ Association (TSSA)
Mick Whelan, general secretary, Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen (ASLEF)
Mick Cash, general secretary, Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers (RMT)
Kevin Courtney, joint general secretary, National Education Union (NEU)
Jo Grady, general secretary, University and College Union (UCU)
Mark Serwotka, general secretary, Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS)
Michelle Stanistreet, general secretary, National Union of Journalists (NUJ)
Steve Gillan, general secretary, Prison Officers Association (POA)
Ian Lawrence, general secretary, NAPO
Bob Monks, general secretary, United Road Transport Union
Reprieve
Police Spies Out Of Lives
Momentum
Open Labour
Campaign Opposing Police Surveillance
Pat Finucane Centre
Privacy International
Committee for Administration of Justice (CAJ)
Rights and Security International
Undercover Research Group
Netpol
Blacklist Support Group
Orgreave Truth and Justice Campaign
Justice 4 Grenfell
Public Interest Law Centre
Big Brother Watch
Jeremy Corbyn MP
John McDonnell MP
Diane Abbott MP
Bell Ribeiro-Addy MP
Ian Lavery MP
Jon Trickett MP
Richard Burgon MP
Kate Osborne MP
Ian Byrne MP
Lloyd Russell-Moyle MP
Claudia Webbe MP
Clive Lewis MP
Bethan Winter MP
Rebecca Long-Bailey MP
Mick Whitley MP
Ian Mearns MP
Grahame Morris MP
Apsana Begum MP
Paula Barker MP
Zarah Sultana MP
Michelle Gildernew MP
Órfhlaith Begley MP
Francie Molloy MP
Mickey Brady MP
Paul Maskey MP
Chris Hazzard MP
John Finucane MP
Baroness Shami Chakrabarti
Baroness Christine Blower
Baroness Pauline Bryan
Lord John Hendy QC
Suresh Grover, co-director, The Monitoring Group
Dorothea Jones, co-director, The Monitoring Group
Terry Renshaw
Kate Flannery
Chris Peace
Laura Pidcock
One comment on “The CHIS Bill: Enshrining Abuse in Law”